<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Flickr for website images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xebidy.com/using-flickr-for-website-images/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xebidy.com/using-flickr-for-website-images/</link>
	<description>Queenstown Web Design for the Social Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:50:30 +1200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://xebidy.com/using-flickr-for-website-images/comment-page-1/#comment-7903</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xebidy.com/?p=133#comment-7903</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got a social network and considering using Flickr to host the networks + Google AppEngine to host the app, it&#039;s not commercial and i&#039;ll never make any money out of it so does that break the terms of use for Flickr.

Sounds like it wouldn&#039;t but I dunno?

What do people think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a social network and considering using Flickr to host the networks + Google AppEngine to host the app, it&#8217;s not commercial and i&#8217;ll never make any money out of it so does that break the terms of use for Flickr.</p>
<p>Sounds like it wouldn&#8217;t but I dunno?</p>
<p>What do people think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://xebidy.com/using-flickr-for-website-images/comment-page-1/#comment-3263</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xebidy.com/?p=133#comment-3263</guid>
		<description>Just looking on the forums - I think the approach is okay - check out http://www.flickr.com/help/forum/29690/ (though there is heaps of other threads on the subject)

Stewart response from Flickr - re their hard line ethos approach is very informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just looking on the forums &#8211; I think the approach is okay &#8211; check out <a href="http://www.flickr.com/help/forum/29690/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/help/forum/29690/</a> (though there is heaps of other threads on the subject)</p>
<p>Stewart response from Flickr &#8211; re their hard line ethos approach is very informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://xebidy.com/using-flickr-for-website-images/comment-page-1/#comment-3246</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xebidy.com/?p=133#comment-3246</guid>
		<description>Cool - I&#039;ll have to look into it.

At the time I was just a little apprehensive about basing an important  part of the site (i.e. the imagery) on a third party server when I was unsure whether or not that could suspend the account at some later date.

Though from what you say the Pro account guidelines have changed - so should be all okay now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool &#8211; I&#8217;ll have to look into it.</p>
<p>At the time I was just a little apprehensive about basing an important  part of the site (i.e. the imagery) on a third party server when I was unsure whether or not that could suspend the account at some later date.</p>
<p>Though from what you say the Pro account guidelines have changed &#8211; so should be all okay now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xebidy</title>
		<link>http://xebidy.com/using-flickr-for-website-images/comment-page-1/#comment-3231</link>
		<dc:creator>xebidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xebidy.com/?p=133#comment-3231</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrew, yeah it seems like a grey area, but we purchased a pro account for all the examples above and in the promotional material it says for holding large quantities of photos for businesses etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew, yeah it seems like a grey area, but we purchased a pro account for all the examples above and in the promotional material it says for holding large quantities of photos for businesses etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://xebidy.com/using-flickr-for-website-images/comment-page-1/#comment-3154</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xebidy.com/?p=133#comment-3154</guid>
		<description>Hey mate - what are the current rules governing this? I looked into it a few years ago and the previous Flickr Terms of Use were:

&quot;Flickr is intended for personal use and is not a generic image hosting service. Professional or corporate uses of Flickr are prohibited.&quot;

When I looked again last year these had changed - though it still seemed a grey area: 

&quot;DonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t use Flickr for commercial purposes. Flickr is for personal use only... &quot;

And lot of the discussions I read since still point it being against the terms for a company to use Flickr as an image hosting service for their commercial website (even if you have a valid API account and so forth - as the commercial use of this seems to surround what you build i.e. the application - rather than it&#039;s use). 

Just wondering if you have had any experience with this - as I&#039;d still like to incorporate the same type of system as you mention above into our websites (I&#039;d developed an upload system based on their APU for staff and web visitors to submit their photos directly to our Flickr account via our website - however never ended up using it for the above reasons).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey mate &#8211; what are the current rules governing this? I looked into it a few years ago and the previous Flickr Terms of Use were:</p>
<p>&#8220;Flickr is intended for personal use and is not a generic image hosting service. Professional or corporate uses of Flickr are prohibited.&#8221;</p>
<p>When I looked again last year these had changed &#8211; though it still seemed a grey area: </p>
<p>&#8220;DonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t use Flickr for commercial purposes. Flickr is for personal use only&#8230; &#8221;</p>
<p>And lot of the discussions I read since still point it being against the terms for a company to use Flickr as an image hosting service for their commercial website (even if you have a valid API account and so forth &#8211; as the commercial use of this seems to surround what you build i.e. the application &#8211; rather than it&#8217;s use). </p>
<p>Just wondering if you have had any experience with this &#8211; as I&#8217;d still like to incorporate the same type of system as you mention above into our websites (I&#8217;d developed an upload system based on their APU for staff and web visitors to submit their photos directly to our Flickr account via our website &#8211; however never ended up using it for the above reasons).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
