<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reciprocal Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xebidy.com/reciprocal-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xebidy.com/reciprocal-links/</link>
	<description>Queenstown Web Design for the Social Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:30:13 +1200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://xebidy.com/reciprocal-links/comment-page-1/#comment-5224</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xebidy.com/?p=189#comment-5224</guid>
		<description>1. Are these reciprocal links?
Definitely. The most common type are Links Page --&gt; Homepage between two sites.

2. Google and link swapping.
It&#039;s not that Google does not like link swapping - they actually encourage it (between &#039;on theme&#039; sites). It&#039;s really that you won&#039;t gain much in terms of SEO from doing it.

3. Outbound links.
These can in fact hurt your site if done wrong. Too many from one page and it could start to enter the &#039;link farm&#039; category. But more importantly they can  disrupt the flow of PR around your own site (by leaking to external sites). 
Breaking up large number of external links over a couple of &#039;categories/pages&#039; is usually the best bet (for both SEO and usability). 
Though in terms of real onsite PR flow - it often boils down to how you use the nofollow tag to direct PR in a structured pattern :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Are these reciprocal links?<br />
Definitely. The most common type are Links Page &#8211;&gt; Homepage between two sites.</p>
<p>2. Google and link swapping.<br />
It&#8217;s not that Google does not like link swapping &#8211; they actually encourage it (between &#8216;on theme&#8217; sites). It&#8217;s really that you won&#8217;t gain much in terms of SEO from doing it.</p>
<p>3. Outbound links.<br />
These can in fact hurt your site if done wrong. Too many from one page and it could start to enter the &#8216;link farm&#8217; category. But more importantly they can  disrupt the flow of PR around your own site (by leaking to external sites).<br />
Breaking up large number of external links over a couple of &#8216;categories/pages&#8217; is usually the best bet (for both SEO and usability).<br />
Though in terms of real onsite PR flow &#8211; it often boils down to how you use the nofollow tag to direct PR in a structured pattern <img src='http://xebidy.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Building</title>
		<link>http://xebidy.com/reciprocal-links/comment-page-1/#comment-5222</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Building</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xebidy.com/?p=189#comment-5222</guid>
		<description>i think they are still considered as reciprocal links as they are from the same domain. i aint sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think they are still considered as reciprocal links as they are from the same domain. i aint sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
