The recent launch of Google Sidewiki is destined to be one of the most controversial products ever to be seen on the Internet. The blogosphere and Twitter stream is simply alive with complaints about the implications of the Sidewiki.
Sidewiki is like a mini-forum or comments board that appears down the side of a website visible to anyone with a Google toolbar installed. Anyone (with a Google toolbar) can leave a comment in the Sidewiki.
The outcry from website owners is that all this will lead to is a giant graffitti board for spammers and competitors to abuse other people’s websites. There is no way for website owners to delete or moderate their comments or even more importantly to opt-out of the technology. Website owners can report abuse – but from what I have read it is taking Google moderators about 48 hours to respond and in the world of online that is a lifetime – moreover, it seems that this lag will blow out further if Sidewiki takes off.
Google’s moto is “do no evil”, but judging by the outcry in social media I would say the general opinion is that in this case they have crossed the line. Josh from www.hostelmanagement.com sums up general feeling when he said on Twitter “if Google wants to have a review site for my website, fine, but not *on top* of my own website. ”
What does this mean for an average business with a website? Well it could be massive. Spammers are clever and they are already working away at applications that will go through the Internet writing alongside websites via Sidewikis quickly and effectively. But, competitors are worse! At the moment there is no way to stop one hotel writing on another hotel’s website, promoting cheaper beds or tour operators slagging each other off. I am definitely not a spammer, but I find myself already considering going to all competitor websites for my clients and writing comments promoting our product – or alternatively my own affiliate links.
An average website owner will need to be vigilant of the comments that are written reporting them to Google as soon as they appear. Likewise they will need to be continually active on Sidewiki on other websites promoting themselves and also being able to respond to any bad press they may get. As yet I have not seen a way to monitor any mentions of your own company in Sidewiki unless Google Alerts works sufficiently quickly. Potentially I could write a blog post about a particular travel experience – say on the Travel Generation website. We currently have a comments section, but I would moderate these if I felt that the conversation was becoming derogatory or unproductive for readers. With Sidewiki this policing will simply not exist.
I found one statistic that said approximately 20% of web users have the Google toolbar installed in their browser – which means that immediately 20% of web users can start writing and viewing comments.
There is no doubt that this technology is going lead to much more heated debate in the coming weeks and some of it is bound to get extremely vitriolic. I for one am against Sidewiki and I agree entirely with Josh that I don’t care if someone develops website review and discussion sites (Digg, Stumble Upon etc are already these) – but I do take offence if it happens on my own site. Already there are solutions being developed that will block Sidewiki from showing up on your site I would expect these to become prevalent pretty quickly. The interesting thought is what will Google then subsequently do to websites that block Sidewiki will they seek retribution through degrading their search results performance – or even blocking them from search results.
In the meantime, I will be perfectly honest – one part of me wants to hook into Sidewiki right now and start writing on everyone’s website promoting my own affiliate links and client sites. Why not play the Google game and become evil?






Ugh. This is an inane post. Please stop wasting people’s time.
Respectfully, you’re missing the blame. Google provides a tool, sidewiki. The content on said tool is not Google’s, no more than the content on this website is the property of your hosting provider. It is the userbase that will bring any “evil”. Just like I’d be at fault to blame your hosting provider for such an evil blog post as this, no one can legitimately blame Google for any “evil” posts on their sidewiki.
“Google’s moto is “do no evil”, but judging by the outcry
in social media I would say the general opinion is that
in this case they have crossed the line.”
Just because there’s an outcry doesn’t mean those people are right!
I don’t know if I agree that this is the level of “evil”, but I agree that this presents a huge problem for people with web pages. It now takes control of a portion of your web page away from you. It is akin to Microsoft’s (I believe) effort at one time to provide links for web pages automatically, in a sense, making it look like you were linking to things you never linked to.
Personally, I think the side wiki will end up proving relatively useless because of the spam and lack of moderation.
OMG I guess Google figures they will get the public to do their dirty work by identifying bad sites but unfortunately I think you are right Daniel and Sidewiki will become a host to spammers & competitors & will turn into a free for all. I for one would be looking to get a service to block the sidewiki and hope Google has second thoughts about letting this evil on the internet. They obviously think they own the internet now & are just planting their mark on everyone’s websites????? WTF
This is a good post by Josh on why Sidewiki is bad: http://joshnotes.com/blogs/josh/google-sidewiki-www-18.html
Ken… It is completely negligent to pass off all blame to the userbase. coz If it can be done… it will. So who allows it to be done? Im not particulalry a huge fan of Smith & Wesson.
I have sooooo many Google things i love. This isn’t one of them. Like Dan, if it comes to it… maybe i’ll promote my own links coz.. “It’s all in the game..yo”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cryMVK1PwuQ
How is putting reviews/comments on SideWiki any different from putting them on a review site (or digg or stumbleupon)? Only asking because you dont seem to mind a specific review site.
The difference between Sidewiki and a review site: A review site is a separate site; Sidewiki sits on top of my site. And it isn’t bona fide reviews that worry people — it’s spammers and unscrupulous self-promoters and trolls.
Sidewiki doesn’t kill Web sites; people kill Web sites.